I was watching CTV on Saturday night, and saw their report on the Canadian being held in Afghanistan on terror related charges. There were two things I found disturbing about the report.
First, watch the report, here.
Or, you can download it from here, (small, 2 megs, with a stupid watermark).
Problem 1: Minimal Research
CTV misidentifies JihadWatch as a “radical website,” that influenced this man to go to Afghanistan with aspirations for martyrdom.
Now, anyone who has ever read JihadWatch would know that it is not a radical website, it does not advocate the radical Islamic ideology, but rather the exact opposite. In fact, the front page of the site says as much.
I immediately emailed Robert Spencer at JihadWatch, and CTV, notifying them of their mistake. On a hunch, I wondered how CTV had made that particular mistake. I googled “jihad,” just to see what would come up. Notice that the second entry, the first entry that is not a Wikipedia article, is JihadWatch. My proposal - the “reporter” at CTV googled jihad, and clicked on the first link that wasn’t a Wikipedia article, not bothering to read one word on the page, and presented it as a “radical website.”
What is particularly egregious is the fact that on that same page of search results, in the top 10 of results, there are two actual radical Islamic/Jihadi websites, both of which are hosted in Canada. I won’t link them, but they are “Jihad Unspun,” hosted from BC, and an article on “youngmuslims.ca” which declares that jihad is a necessary part of the Islamic faith, with this bit of the page quoted in the google search:
With at least two legitimate choices in their top 10 search results, CTV highlights JihadWatch as a radical website.
This was also mentioned on JihadWatch yesterday morning.
Problem 2: Shoddy Reporting
In the video of the report, there are a couple of things I would like to point out. In the download version above, (I am not sure about the times in the report as presented on CTV’s site), at 40 seconds, the Imam who has come forward states “It does not come as a surprise, I was sort of expecting it unfortunately.” Apparently, he had a meeting with the student now accused, where the man told the Imam that he wanted to help his “Afghan brothers,” in jihad. The Imam then goes on to say that he informed the student that he had an obligation to take this information to the authorities, and that he would not be an accomplice to his actions. The reporter then says, “but he never did go to the authorities.”
So, let me get this straight. A radicalized Canadian Muslim comes to an Imam. That Muslim then goes to Afghanistan where he is detained and accused of planning a violent attack against UN peacekeeping forces. AT THAT POINT, the Imam comes out and says that he “sort of expected,” this, and that he told the guy he was going to the authorities, but he never did… And the CTV reporter brushes this off, not pushing the Imam on this, or considering it the least bit noteworthy/controversial/suspicious?
Further, at 2.12, the reporter says that the Imam has “no regrets,” and he says that “we certainly did our part.”
What part did he do? He met with the kid behind closed doors, after which the kid went on a suicide bombing mission, and he did not report the kid’s plans to the authorities. It makes me wonder what part he considers was his to play. And, why the CTV reporter didn’t pursue this.
Unresearched reporting, and softballs. That is how the media handles stories of Canadians participating in Jihad.
Correction: I wrote “UN forces” above. Talk about shoddy reporting. The UN isn’t in Afghanistan. Eh…at least I admit when I’m wrong.
Tags: CTV, bad reporting, Islam, Canada
news, media, canada | 1 Comment »