There were a number of comments on my post below about the “Stop the War Rally” that happened last Saturday, August 12, here in Toronto. You can read the comments at that post, if you would like. Most of the comments and trackbacks were supportive. A few were of an opposing opinion.

I’m just one guy here, writing a blog that I figured nobody read, and that was fine with me. And maybe we will go back to nobody reading. But that is just to say that 14 comments on one of my posts, and my hits being about 5x their norm this month already, was a big surprise to me. Thanks to those who linked to me, I think it is important to share those pictures of the so-called “peace rally.”

But, I just wanted to take a little space to respond to the opposing opinions that were left.

First, by Mr. Canada, who commented on two posts:

Well, I agree with the Hezbollah Supports in one way..Isreal, has freaking gone INSANE.

So how are we going bury another one of our great protests of the 21st century?

Took awhile for people to forget the Peace marches, ;)

(By Peace, I mean Burn almost every American Flag on the continent and scream Yankee Go Home and other such chants filled with Anti-Americanism. All in all, great fun.)

and, in response to my comment that 82% of Canadians agree with Israel’s right to defend itself, Mr. Canada responded:

82% of us agree?

82% of us are idiots then.

As I myself am not Canadian, and quite probably do not have the requisite pool of shared knowledge to understand which event in particular Mr. Canada is refering to, I can not comment too much on it. However, I am interested in the fact that he does agree with Hezbollah supporters, at least in one way. He also has not stated how Israel has gone INSANE, or, how he thinks they should have handled the situation. However, he does resort to the tactics of the talking heads who are far Left of Centre - he resorts to calling names, without offering any genuine or thought out criticism, or an alternate solution. Notice, he does this again in the second comment - calling Canadians who support Israel idiots. This tactic can be seen quite blatantly over at this blog, where, instead of addressing Girl on the Right’s comments, they instead resort to calling her “racist skank girl.” Interesting form of argument - but not one that I find very intelligent, or particularly compelling.

Further, as an American, in Canada, as a guest of the country, I would like to say that I love it here. Canada is a great country, and by and large, I have been welcomed. I am, however, tired of the complex that some have in which they find it necessary to insult Americans every chance they get. But whatever.

Secondly, the commentator “Truth,” writes the following:

These people are obviously angry and frustrated, but I find it funny how all of the pictures here focus on the minority of people at the demo who were pro hezbollah. Also although hezbollah is considered a terrorist organization in Canada it doesnt mean that it is a terrorist organization. In fact all it does is protect the intrests of its people and considering that it was Isreal who has launched repeated attacks on lebenon and not lebenon on Isreal it would make sense to fight back, and hezbollah is doing just that. It seems that every other country in the world besides Canada, USA, and Israel can understand that since hezbollah is only considered to be terrorist in those three countries.

Che Guevara a slayer of innocents and a war monger? Is he any worse than president bush? Any worse than PM Olmert? At least he was fighting for the majority of the population and for the people, if you looked at an unbiased Israeli source you would see that there are many Israelis who are sensible and who do not approve of Israels actions.

Yet many of you speak as if your opinions are not media generate and unbiased. Pathetic really.

Now there is an intelligent post. “Truth” finds it funny that the pictures focus on the “minority of people” at the rally in favor of Hezbollah. Well, I was there, and there were a lot of Hezbollah supporters. Further, I find it justified to say that the majority of the crowd was in favor of Hezbollah by the very fact that the vast majority of the crowd cheered and applauded at the mention of the Israeli soldiers’ deaths - at the hands of Hezbollah. I might also add that this announcement was made by the organizer/leader of the rally. Also, I refer you to my recounting below of the woman who was made to put her banner away, simply because it criticized Hezbollah’s terrorism, alongside her condemnation of Israel. That pretty much speaks for itself.

I would differ on the point of Israel launching countless attacks on Lebanon. I am not here to defend all of Israel’s actions, as if the country could do no wrong. I am saying that we should all remember that this current conflict began with Hezbollah crossing the internationally recognized border, and taking two Israeli soldiers from Israel’s sovereign territory. By your same logic, I would say that it only makes sense for Israel to fight back. Also, it is dubious at best to say that Hezbollah protects the people’s interests - Hezbollah protects Hezbollah’s (and quite probably Syria’s and Iran’s) interests. It does good work, but it also does it for self-serving purposes, such as hiding weapons caches among civilian populations, in hospitals, and in schools.

Hezbollah is considered a terrorist organization by more than the United States, Canada, and Israel. In addition to those three, Hezbollah in full or in part is recognized as a terror organization by the UK, the Netherlands, and Australia. Further, the EU has recognized Hezbollah as using terrorist activities, and the EU Council includes Hezbollah’s senior intelligence officer as a “terrorist.” While the UN does not label Hezbollah a terrorist organization, it has called for the militia’s disarmament, and has criticized it’s targeting of civlilans. For more see the Wikipedia article on Hezbollah.

Is Che Guevera worse than Bush or Olmert? Yes. That’s all I have to say about that.

I will admit that my opinions are formed by the media. At least I am aware of this, and as a result, I try to inform myself through exposure to broad media sources. From the media input I receive I form an (hopefully) intelligent opinion, constructing my view of the world around me. Is my view perfect? No. Is it always correct? Not even close. But I try.

Finally, there is the post from Lee Roy Jackson, who says:

And they think this is posed?:

http://www.bubbleshare.com/album/51546/1515576/overview

Check the images, do you really think this is posed??

He is, of course, refering to the photos at Qana. The link leads to a photo slideshow with some gruesome images coming from the attack. As I have said before, I think the attack was a tragedy. Do I think that the images were at least managed for greatest effect on public opinion by Hezbollah? - I do. Do I think the images were posed - yep, I do. Tragic - yes. Posed - another yes. Tragic that they were posed, another big yes.

Well, there you go. Just thought I would take the time to answer some of the critics. Thanks for the comments.

Casey

technorati tags :

13 Responses to “Toronto’s Pro-Hezbollah Rally - Revisited”

Note from Management:

Comments reflect the views of their authors, and in no way do they represent the views, or opinions, of the site owner. I do not endorse a particular opinion just because someone came and wrote it here. I do, however, take responsibility for my own comments. Comments are largely unmoderated, but if they are spam, or incredibly derogatory or offensive, they will be deleted.

First off I would like to say thank you for attempting a civilized discussion and not going with the senseless ranting many of the other bloggers here.

You are right actually I checked up on the demo and also heard from other sources including people about the cheering when the death tolls were stated, and although i find that innapropriate you must understand their position. This is the army thats been oppressing them for years, and is at it again, the reason they approve the killing is because it shows how lebenon can stand up to Israel’s bullying.

Also yes you are correct that hezbollah did kidnap two soldiers, but they did it in order to set up a trade for the thousands of illegally captured prisoners that Israel captured. If you try and remember past a point of only 2 months you would realize the motive behind hezbollah’s actions. I admit that it was irresponsible and I can gaurentee that hezbollah knew that Israel would attack, but it was a tactical move to force off some pressure from the palestinians so that Israel would have to fight two fronts. Nevertheless kidnapping two soldiers is no legit excuse for launching all out war on a country, its obviously an excuse and not a true reason.

Also you are right about those other countries partly recognizing hezbollah as terrorists, but just look at what countries they are. Completely western influenced countries which are naturally going to side with America’s biased point of view. Not to mention that if the definition of a terrorist state or organization was used in Israel’s case or even the US, one would see that they fit it perfectly.

Also Che Guevara’s crimes are nothing compared to Bush or Olmert’s. Please do some unbiased research before you lable someone something that you are not even sure of.

And as you say your opinion is mostly based off of the media. I also live in the same city as you but I tend to keep my options open. I am friends actually with many Jews and Isrealis and I am in no way racist and my opinion is not biased. I listen to all opinions and respect them even if they oppose mine, and would once again like to thank you for responding in a civilized manner, unlike the many islamophobic rants i recieve from other sites.

Note that I do not fully agree with hezbollah because I believe in peace. A peace which is achieved from all perspectives with a unifying agreement, not an illusionary peace which has one empire governing and threatening all others in the name of justice.

I apologise for the double post, but I just read your response saying that those pictures were posed. That’s completely untrue. How would people feel if someone claimed that pictures from the holocaust were “posed”? Well it has happened and it led to arrests and accusations of anti-semitism. You (nor I) do not doubt the authenticity of the holocaust, so why should you doubt the authenticity of this? Seems like false media strikes again.

Truth,

I appreciate your thought out and reasoned response. I appreciate and respect your opinions, just disagree with the majority of them. I will say just a couple of things.

The cheering of the soldiers’ deaths - I am glad that you agree that it is inappropriate, especially at a rally asking for peace. I think that the crowd last Saturday was a very mixed and complicated crowd. However, that was very disturbing to me.

Also - I think that you can try to justify Hezbollah’s actions all you like, or Hamas’ actions, or whoever’s actions - I just don’t think that they are defensible. I am not the kind of person who would defend Israel no matter what, I am not so naive to think that Israel can do no wrong. I do look at all the bombing in Lebanon and wonder why the extent of the destruction was necessary. However, I am not going to play “armchair general,” and say that they should have done it another way. I don’t know what intelligence the Israeli army had, or why they deemed things necessary. I am sad that civilians died. However, I don’t believe that Israel targets civilians - while it is Hezbollah’s expressed goal to target civilians. In fact, Hezbollah targets, specifically, Jewish civilians - calling on Arabs in Jewish cities to leave, so that they can target the Israelis.

In any event, my point is, it doesn’t matter to me if it is “Western” nations that recognize Hezbollah as terrorist or not. Their targeting of civilians, hiding among civilian populations, and expressed goal of destroying the nation of Israel, make them a terror organization - not where the countries that consider them as such are located geographically or politically. Just because other Islamic or Arab groups/countries might agree with these tactics do not make them any more right or any less terrorist. Any time a group has as a goal the extermination of a people it smacks of genocide. And it is indefensible.

Also - I disagree with the characterization of the US or of Israel as terrorist states. Please give an explanation of what criteria you are using here? Just becuase a nation uses its military in a way that one does not like does not make it a terrorist state. Both armies wear uniforms which distinguish them from civilian populations. Both armies do not target, nor hide among, civilians. Neither army uses terror tactics such as suicide bombers (which I know Hezbollah is reluctant to use - but groups like Hamas use liberally). You may disagree with the US’s foreign policy - but that does not make them terrorists.

Also, I said that media influences my opinion because it is an inescapable fact - media influences all of our opinions. In the world in which we live, it is impossible to not be influenced by media.

Finally, I will say what I have been saying all along. Qana was a tragedy. It is a fact (probably) that 28 people died that day - mostly women and children. There is no excuse for it. There are two things that I think need to be said though - 1) Hezbollah shares guilt in those people’s deaths, if only because of the fact that they hide among and fire rockets from the midst of civilian populations, and 2) there is evidence that the photos were staged. That is not to say that the deaths weren’t real - they were. It is to say that Hezbollah has a relatively effective propoganda machine that has been able to manipulate Western media. I think that the work done over at EUReferendum about the Qana photos is compelling, and, the photoshopping of photos by stringers does not lend credibility to the photos coming out of Lebanon. I do not doubt the authenticity of the event - I doubt the details, and believe that there is a different viable narrative, or at least a fuller account, that could be told.

Sorry if I am rambling, it is about 4 am. Thanks for the response,
Casey

The fact that you think Hezbollah’s actions are not defensible and most of Israel’s are is because you fail to take into mind important history and facts. Hezbollah although it does hide among the civilians, it is not without their consent that they do so, most of the lebenese civilians justify Hezbollah just as you justify Israel and the US.

The official definition of terrorism is as follows: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons. To tell me that this does not apply to Israel and the US would be lying. If you could see what the US and Israel did in their past and up until now you will understand the truth to that statement.

Calling on Arabs in jewish cities… its not really like they can telepathically talk only to the Arabs that just sounds like complete misinterpretation of facts and basically a play on words. Also the reason Hezbollah has to use guerilla tactics is because if they didn’t they would be totally obliterated by the high-tech weapons that the Israelis posses (courtesy of the USA).

And as i said before i do not completely agree with hezbollah but I see the reasons behind what their doing. There is a large difference between agreement, and understanding.

Finally if you don’t take my word for this then look at the opinions of many different intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky. He can explain all of this much better than I can.

Thank you for the reply and I hope that my reply clarified my points of argument.

First off I would like to say that I am not trying to justify hezbollah’s action either morally or generally, all I am doing is telling you the reasons behind hezbollah’s actions. As I said before I do not fully agree with hezbollah but whether I do or don’t makes no difference. There is a strict difference between agreement and explanation, and I am just tryin to explain Hezbollah’s motives.

Also the fact that it doesn’t matter to you that it is only Western influenced nation that consider hezbollah terrorist does not prove that they are. As you know (or should now) the US government has one of the most effective propaganda campaigns ever invented (agree or disagree this is a fact). Also the whole history of the US was built upon greed and power just as is the history of every significant empire. So pbviously the fact that it is a western opinion is a large part of all of this.

Hezbollah uses guerilla tactics, because if they didn’t lebenon would be completely obliterated by Israel’s high-tech weapons (courtesy of the USA). Also Hezbollah hid with the civilians consent. Why did the civilians give consent, because they know hezbollah are the only ones fighting for their cause.

The definition of terrorism is as follows: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons. Saying that this does not fit Israel and the US would be ignorant of everything they built themselves upon and even what they are doing currently in the world.

Believe it or not arabs cannot telepathically communicate with each other so the fact that hezbollah told Arabs to leave the cities is a complete play on words because the jews there would also receive the message rendering the whole point useless.

Finally I mistook the disaster in Qana with the original one, I actually haven’t looked into the recent one so I don’t know about that.

Thank you for replying and I hope that my reply will help you understand this point of view.

Again sorry for the double post but I thought my first post didn’t come through so i thought I needed to write a new one

Truth,

No worries on the “double post.”

I appreciate the open dialogue we are having here. I will be honest though - I am not sure that either of us will make much progress changing the other’s mind. However, I am interested in your point of view, and am grateful for the exchange as it affords me the opportunity to think out my own position on these important matters.

I also appreciate that you do not “agree” with Hezbollah, but merely “understand their motives.” That is fine with me. I do, however, think that you are ignoring one of their (along with Iran and Syria) main motives - which is the eradication of the Jewish state. Hezbollah, Iran, and Syria have said as much. This, in my opinion, is bordering on an advocacy of genocide. This, no matter who is making the claim, is indefensible. From the Wikipedia article on Hezbollah (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah#Position_on_Israel). Quote:

Hezbollah’s founding aims included resistance against the occupation of Lebanon by Israel (1978-2000). From the inception of the organization to the present [7][5][45] [46][47] the elimination of the state of Israel has been one of Hezbollah’s goals. Secretary-General Nasrallahs has stated that Israel is an illegal usurper entity, which is based on falsehood, massacres, and illusions.[48], and considers the elimination of Israel to be fundamental to the establishment of peace in the middle east: “There is no solution to the conflict in this region except with the disappearance of Israel.”[49][50] In an interview with the Washington Post, Nasrallah said “I am against any reconciliation with Israel. I do not even recognize the presence of a state that is called “Israel.” I consider its presence both unjust and unlawful. That is why if Lebanon concludes a peace agreement with Israel and brings that accord to the Parliament our deputies will reject it; Hezbollah refuses any conciliation with Israel in principle.”. [51]

End quote

Sources are cited in the article.

On the fact that it is Western nations opining that Hezbollah is a terrorist entity: This very issue I think is key. The Western and Islamic mindsets are different. Very different. It seems to me that these Islamic nations are all about getting their way by any means necessary. They have a a “Final Solution” the destruction of the nation of Israel. To almost any Western mind, this should come across as unconscionable…especially in the wake of the Holocaust.

I also take exception to the idea that the United States and Israel are themselves terrorist organizations. In the definition you provide, I would say that one of the key words is “unlawful.” First, what about Hezbollah’s actions is lawful? It is against internationally recognized rules of war that an army hide among civilians (whether the civilians consent or not), that an army target civilians of another nation. Further, what is lawful about crossing an internationally recognized border and kidnapping soldiers from a sovereign nation’s armed force? Please - answer these questions.

Secondly, I would like to know what about the United States’ and Israel’s campaigns are “unlawful.? I am not saying that I agree with every action of the US, or of Israel, but to paint with such a broad brush stroke makes EVERY ENTITY WITH WHICH YOU DISAGREE A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION. In fact, by ignoring the “unlawful” language in the definition, any nation taking any military action for any reason could be labeled terrorist.

About Nasrallah’s call to Israeli Arabs - here are his words, from an AP article:

Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah on Wednesday warned all Israeli Arabs to leave the port city of Haifa so his guerrilla organization could step up attacks without fear of shedding the blood of fellow Muslims.

“I have a special message to the Arabs of Haifa, to your martyrs and to your wounded. I call you to leave this city. I hope you do this. Please leave so we don’t shed your blood, which is our blood.”

End quote

Do you really think that he meant to warn the Jews in Haifa as well? Come on. Please, if that is the position you are going to take, then I think that you need to examine the extent to which you are coming to this issue from a critical thinking standpoint. There is no play on words here. Nasrallah is targeting Haifa, a civilian target, in which there is no military asset, with missles that fall indiscriminately, and he is telling the people of his own race/faith to flee, so that the only one’s killed are the Jews. The point is not useless - the entire episode goes to the blatant anti-semetism, and hoped for genocide of the Jews that terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas hold as their core beliefs.

My friend - I appreciate your candor, and your open dialogue. I am more fully coming to understand your position. It is just that I whole-heartedly disagree with it.

Casey

The first thing you must realize is one of the main moral beliefs that obviously people are not aware of. Treat everyone else with the same standards that you treat yourself. The only reason i argue that hezbollah is not a terrorist entity is because with the current definition USA and Israel would also be considered terrorists (and on a larger scale). Therefore there is no point of the term and the only reason I stated that USA and Israel are is because of the constant blind statements that hezbollah is as well. So then what makes USA right and Hezbollah wrong. Nothing you have many facts confused and also obviously lack knowledge in the history of both Israel and the USA as well as Hezbollah.

Israel was created basically as a type of reperation for what the jews had to suffer during the holocaust. The two nations that agreed to the founding of Israel were Germany and the USA. Now I fail to see how that in any way involves the palistinians. Their lands are taken and they are forced to live as the lower class members of society in a land which is rightfully theirs. The main aggressor in the middle east is Israel. This isn’t my opinion, this is how it is based on facts. If you don’t believe me try looking it up with many different sources becuase as I see it what I say isn’t changing your opinion.

Also that is not genocide, genocide is what the Americans did at Nicaragua that is genocide, eliminating the state of Israel isn’t.

Also Nasrallah is not anti semetic because he met dealt with and is friends with leftist jewish intellectuals. One that you might know becuase of extreme controversy and political incorrectness, but truth nonetheless, is Noam Chomsky.

Look at the facts please, Hezbollah’s “atrocities” don’t even compare to those of the USA and of Israel. I would also like to add that probably contrary to your beleifs I am not a Muslim and am probably the very type of person you would expect to have the average media generated POV of most people.

I realize that I am not able to change your opinion but its good to see that at least someone else is trying to express themselves and their beliefs. But please don’t accuse Hezbollah’s core beliefs as being those evil things, you do not know their beliefs, thats just what the media wants you to think. You must understand also that the US propaganda is monstrous compared to any of the Islamic states, and in actuality it is the most effective and largest in history. It doesn’t seem like it but thats part of its complex structure and efficiency.

Hopefully you realize all of these things, thank you for your time and replies.

Truth,

Again, thanks for your reply.

I am a bit confused, however, because you did not really answer any of my objections or questions from the previous post. In fact, it seems that what you have done is repeat your previous objections, and included what is popularly refered to as “The Golden Rule.”

You have not commented on the difference I stated between the USA and Israel on the one hand, and Hezbollah on the other - which has to do with the key word in your definition: unlawful. How are Hezbollah’s kidnap of soldiers, firing rockets into Israel indiscriminately at civilians, and hiding among civilians “lawful” acts. These actions go against internationally recognized standards of conducting warfare. As such, they are terrorist acts. Maybe they are not considered “terrorist” from a Muslim perspective - just as suicide bombing is not necessarily a terrorist act, but one of religious heroism. But I am going with the definition that you have provided, and am writing from a Western perspective. Further, while I do not agree with all of America’s or Israel’s actions, you have not stated what makes thier actions, especially in the most recent conflict, unlawful, and therefore terrorist. I cannot accept your conetntion that Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization, and that the USA and Israel are. Especially when it doesn’t add up according to your own definition.

I am not sure what facts and history I am ignorant of. If you could let me know, then maybe things would be clearer.

Further, I think that your history on Israel’s creation is a little fuzzy. Before WW2, in the late 19th century, Jews began to migrate to what is now Israel. There were a few waves of migration between that time and the end of WW2, sponsored by the British, who controlled the area after WW1. While it was after WW2 that Israel declared sovereignty, the land had been split between the Jews and Arabs by the British, as the land was assigned British administration after WW1. While the Arabs rejected this plan, and the Jewish community accepted it, in 1948, Israel declared sovereignty. And the Arab-Israeli wars followed.

My point here is that the Israelis moving into the Middle East began with the migration of Jewish communities there, and them buying up land - which is the same thing being done in Europe currently by Muslims : http://rainfallsoneveryone.com/2006/08/islamization-of-europe/
Is it alright for Muslims to be doing this in Europe currently, while Jews doing it in the Middle East in the late 1900’s was not alright?

As much as you would like to believe that the statement “Israel is the aggressor in the Middle East” is based on fact, and not on opinion, you are wrong. It is an opinion, just as my statement that Hezbollah is a terrorist entity is an opinion - an opinion based upon facts - but an opinion nonetheless. Further, if Israel is the main aggressor in the Middle East, why is it that even the Palestinian Authority cannot control its militant groups - http://www.solomonia.com/blog/archives/009026.shtml

I do not know what you consider genocide. The definition with whcih I am working is:

“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

Does that apply to what Hezbollah, Iran, Syria, and Hamas desire for Israel? I think so.
From BBC:
quote -
Iran’s president has defended his widely criticised call for Israel to be “wiped off the map”.

Attending an anti-Israel rally in Tehran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said his remarks were “just” - and the criticism did not “have any validity”.
-end quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4384264.stm

Or Nasrallah’s comment: “There is no solution to the conflict in this region except with the disappearance of Israel.”

Genocide? You tell me.

I’ll tell you. NO. Israel being wiped off the map means that the state of Israel must not exist it does NOT mean that all of the people in it will be destroyed. Also if that is what it meant then the Arabs in Israel would be destroyed as well.

USA’s whole history is filled with acts of genocide and mass manipulation. Frankly I’m tired of explaining this and yes Israel is the aggressor. I have no need to try and explain because you will keep giving me specific situations in which the other countries in the Mid east did the same. One thing you don’t realize is that they did it in defense. Israel is constantly killing and kidnapping Palestinians and constantly kidnapping Lebanese people. They began this before Hezbollah was even formed. Their atrocities are the reason that Hezbollah was formed.

Also I didn’t say (or mean to say i can’t recall if i did or didn’t) that Hezbollah isn’t a terrorist organization. I said If USA and Israel aren’t then Hezbollah is not either.

Try and justify the bombardment of Nicaragua. Try and justify the exploitation of Latin Americans. Try and justify the atrocities America is commiting in Iraq starting with Saddam. Who put him in power in Iraq? America did. Just as they trained Bin Laden and many other Jihadists. These are facts which cannot be obtained simply by searching the media because they do not report on things like this.

Also muslims did not create their own muslim state in europe so that is totally different. Also they are not supported by the worlds current superpower and given weapons of mass destruction by them (except Saddam who obtained his weapons from the USA)

And let’s say that the creation of Israel is somehow justified. Why don’t they come up with a two state solution having both palistine and israel as existant states? Is that also somehow justified.

Genocide is when the Brits killed off all of the Natives using smallpox. Genocide is not a statement that has been manipulated.

I don’t see what questions I haven’t answered, everything is pretty clear. Also instead of getting all of your sources from right wing media try looking at the leftist point of view. I can’t say centre because it doesn’t exist.

Before I finish this I want you to look at what America is. They are based on right wing rich people feeding off of the others. They don’t even have a proper democracy. The choices with the votes are to vote between two people who both finished some uptight school, do not care about any of the issues that affect the average citizens and can only properly represent something like 2 percent of the whole population.

Alright, Truth - you and I are just going to have to disagree.

I understand that this is an important and emotional issue for you. However, what I am hearing from you is the same rhetoric that I have heard from others, and from the beginning of our conversation. I feel that we have heard each other, and are not going to cahnge one another’s minds. I disagree with almost everything that you mention.

But, for the sake of answering you, I will say a couple of more things.

First, I can see how one might interpret the statement that “Israel should be wiped off the map,” as referring to the state no longer existing - with all the population then being displaced, instead of referring to genocide. Fine. However, I think you should agree that it could also be interpreted as genocidal - especially when taken in conjunction with the actions of those nations/organization that make such statements. Hezbollah firing rockets indiscreminently into Israeli civilian population, I have said from the beginning, smacks of genocide. Iran, quite obviously building nuclear weapons in direct violation of international law (here we go back to “terrorism”) and stating that Israel should be “wiped off the map” is quite indicative of their intentions. At the very least, admit that this is a potentially valid interpretation.

Second of all - I don’t have to justify any of the actions of the United States - or anyone else for that matter. That is not what this debate is about. This debate began as a discussion about Hezbollah, and their terrorist tactics. This is nothing to do with the US and Niceragua. The US has not attacked Lebanon - or Hezbollah - or Iran - in this debate, I am not required to defend the USAs actions. I began by saying that Hezbollah’s actions are indefendible. And I stand by that - regardless of what the US may or may not have done in Central America decades ago. It has no bearing on the leaglity, or justification, or description as “terrorist”, of Hezbollah’s actions against Israel.

Again, I never said that Muslims created their own state in Europe. I compared their current practice of pruchasing large portions of real estate in Europe, North America, and elsewhere, and creating Muslim communities, with the purpose of Islamization - comparing this with Israel’s practice in the late 19th century of Zionism. However, I do believe that the Muslim plan probably has something to do with creating their own states in these locations.

Two-state solution, I’m game. Like I said, I do not think that Israel, because it is Israel, is automatically correct all of the time. Though, I have little respect for the terrorist tactics of their neighbors, such as suicide bombing, and kidnapping not just soldiers, but Western News reporters, etc…

Also, if the media does not report on the things you are claiming, then where do you get your sources? How can they be verified? In short, why should I believe them?

Finally, I do not need for you to lecture me about what America is. I am an American, and have lived most of my life in the United States. For all of its shortcomings, it is a great nation. There is more to America than your caricature grants it, and I find your description offensive. Have you ever been to the US? Have you spent time there? Or, do you get your information from the Main Stream Media, and, like many other Canadians, base your idea of America on a reactionary stance - identifying yourself more than anything as “not American”? The United States is not a perfect place. It is not even a perfect democracy. But it is a pretty damn good place. Tell me: if it is such a terrible place, why do people all over the world want to be there?

I’m tired of repeating myself so I guess it looks like we will have to disagree and end it at that. Too bad you will never understand the truth

Yeah, too bad…

…but I’m ok with it.

Something to say?